Loopholes

It is painful when you finally realize that the money you expected to be repaid is never coming back. The tiny silver lining in that cloud might be the tax benefit of “writing off” the debt. Unfortunately, that silver lining may well be eclipsed by an even bigger cloud. Writing bad debt off is not that easy, and there’s probably no silver lining to that cloud. Ironically, you might find that the mistakes that caused you to be holding a bad debt might be what prevents you from getting a usable deduction.

Tax professionals are inundated with tax developments from all branches of the government and from all levels of government on a daily basis. Our technical tax knowledge expands weekly. Given the immensity of tax law changes in P.L. 119-21 (July 4, 2025), informally named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and the guidance we’ll continue to get over the next few years along with non-OBBBA updates, we might run out of time and bandwidth to step back and ask what additional relevance this guidance, as well as various reports issued by the government every day, mean for the well-being of our tax system. This article unpacks select tax law changes and government documents to offer four subtle messages within them. Generally, the messages don’t bode well for an effective tax and revenue system. The article ends with some suggestions on what can help improve our tax system.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Sirius Solutions L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner may change our views of entity choice. If the decision holds up, partnerships will be able to effectively make the portion of limited partner income subject to self-employment tax whatever they want, including zero. This contrasts with the IRS position upheld by the Tax Court in Soroban Capital that treated all of the income of limited partners who were active in the business as self-employment income.

April brings both anomalies and the same-old from Tax Court. Congressional enactments that misfire give opportunities to inventive practitioners, while self-represented petitioners continue to do the darndest things. All these are teaching moments that make "the small court" a continuing professional education course that never ends.

Think Outside the Tax Box is thrilled to bring you the 2026 Summer Education Series, sponsored by Sandy Bay! The fifth installment of this beloved annual series, we will be bringing our loyal subscribers monthly webinars featuring some of the brightest minds in tax all summer long. Each webinar will feature our usual blend of high-quality education and entertainment and include continuing education credits for those who qualify. All of this is included in your regular subscription! Continue reading to see what we have in store...

In the Fall of 2025, Bitcoin reached an all-time high of over $120,000. Since then, it fell over 40% to under $70,000 in the first quarter of 2026, before slightly recovering, currently resting around $75,000 as of this writing. With the steep drop in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, a common question from taxpayers is whether they can use the current losses to offset their other income. Large investors and professionals such as Grant Cardone and Shehan Chandrasekera (Head of Tax Strategy at Cointracker) have suggested that cryptocurrency can be sold and bought back immediately to claim the tax benefits. As with most things, the answer to this is not as simple as they portray, and many commentators, influencers, and sometimes professionals, miss the intricacies of cryptocurrency taxation.

The buzz around the Kwong v. United States decision is quickly turning into something very real for practitioners: potentially a wave of Form 843 claims tied to COVID-era penalties and interest. With voices like Frank Agostino pushing for action, the message is clear: dig into client transcripts and don’t sit this one out, even though the outcome is still being litigated.

The 2025 court decision, Kwong v. United States, is quietly gaining traction among tax professionals for exactly these reasons. Its implications could be far-reaching, potentially opening the door to refund claims, penalty abatements, and revived tax deadlines that many assumed were long closed. But there’s a catch: the opportunity to act may be time-sensitive, and the window to preserve claims could begin closing in just a few short weeks. Here’s what the court actually decided and why it matters now.