Looking to cut down on self-employment taxes on your partnership income? Converting your partnership into an S corporation might be the answer. If you currently run your business as a partnership or an LLC taxed as a partnership, you’re probably familiar with the sting of self-employment taxes. Unlike shareholder-employees of an S corporation, who only pay Social Security and Medicare taxes on their salaries, partners typically get hit with self-employment taxes on their entire share of the business’s net income. That can add up fast. By transitioning to an S corporation, you can restructure how you take your income—splitting it between salary and profit distributions. The big advantage? Those profit distributions are not subject to self-employment tax, potentially saving you thousands each year. So, if reducing your tax burden sounds appealing, let’s break down how a tax-free Section 351 incorporation works and what you need to know before making the move.
Lessons Learned from the Tax Court: What’s at Stake?
Matt Metras, EA
Astute readers of this publication may recognize that I frequently write on Cryptocurrency and also on Tax Court cases. It feels like Christmas to me to be able to write about a tax court case about crypto. This is only the Third Tax court case to even mention crypto, and the first to look at the underlying principles of taxation. (The other two were about including crypto assets in a CDP hearing and a frivolous tax protester argument). Today’s case, Paschall v. Commissioner, is about the taxation of staking income.
