April brings both anomalies and the same-old from Tax Court. Congressional enactments that misfire give opportunities to inventive practitioners, while self-represented petitioners continue to do the darndest things. All these are teaching moments that make "the small court" a continuing professional education course that never ends.

Think Outside the Tax Box is thrilled to bring you the 2026 Summer Education Series, sponsored by Sandy Bay! The fifth installment of this beloved annual series, we will be bringing our loyal subscribers monthly webinars featuring some of the brightest minds in tax all summer long. Each webinar will feature our usual blend of high-quality education and entertainment and include continuing education credits for those who qualify. All of this is included in your regular subscription! Continue reading to see what we have in store...

In the Fall of 2025, Bitcoin reached an all-time high of over $120,000. Since then, it fell over 40% to under $70,000 in the first quarter of 2026, before slightly recovering, currently resting around $75,000 as of this writing. With the steep drop in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, a common question from taxpayers is whether they can use the current losses to offset their other income. Large investors and professionals such as Grant Cardone and Shehan Chandrasekera (Head of Tax Strategy at Cointracker) have suggested that cryptocurrency can be sold and bought back immediately to claim the tax benefits. As with most things, the answer to this is not as simple as they portray, and many commentators, influencers, and sometimes professionals, miss the intricacies of cryptocurrency taxation.

The buzz around the Kwong v. United States decision is quickly turning into something very real for practitioners: potentially a wave of Form 843 claims tied to COVID-era penalties and interest. With voices like Frank Agostino pushing for action, the message is clear: dig into client transcripts and don’t sit this one out, even though the outcome is still being litigated.

Early in my career as a tax professional, I thought identifying strategic opportunities was primarily a function of technical knowledge. If I just knew enough tax law, I assumed the right strategies would naturally reveal themselves when reviewing a client's situation. This assumption led to a haphazard approach where I might spot a planning opportunity for one client but completely miss an identical opportunity for another simply because I wasn't methodically looking for it. This inconsistent approach changed when, leaning on my training as an instrument rated pilot, it occurred to me that I should be following a structured process that assures that I won’t miss any opportunities. That observation transformed my practice. I realized that identifying strategic opportunities isn't just about what you know—it's about how systematically you apply that knowledge. Even the most knowledgeable tax professional will miss opportunities without a structured methodology for uncovering them. In this article, I'll share the systematic strategic analysis process I've developed over three decades of tax practice. This methodology doesn't replace technical knowledge—it magnifies its impact by ensuring you consistently identify opportunities across diverse client situations.

The accounting world is changing fast. Computers and AI now handle much of the boring, repetitive work that humans used to do by hand. This is great for saving time and catching mistakes, but it also introduces a new challenge: "mental rust" or “cognitive atrophy.” If we rely on computers for most of our thinking, our own problem‑solving skills can weaken. Recent studies suggest that heavy reliance on AI tools is associated with lower scores on some critical thinking tests. When we stop practicing how to solve problems ourselves, we may be less prepared when something unusual happens that the computer cannot handle. To stay sharp, accountants need to find practical ways to keep their brains working hard. Here are 100 simple ways to keep your mind strong in the age of AI.

The 2025 court decision, Kwong v. United States, is quietly gaining traction among tax professionals for exactly these reasons. Its implications could be far-reaching, potentially opening the door to refund claims, penalty abatements, and revived tax deadlines that many assumed were long closed. But there’s a catch: the opportunity to act may be time-sensitive, and the window to preserve claims could begin closing in just a few short weeks. Here’s what the court actually decided and why it matters now.

Two veteran clients with seemingly similar financial profiles can end up with very different outcomes, simply based on where they live and how informed they are. Much of that difference comes down to smaller, state-specific benefits that tend to sit just outside the typical planning checklist. But when layered alongside federal veteran benefits, they can reshape major decisions like where to buy a home or settle long-term. For advisors working with military families, recognizing how these state benefits show up in real life can go a long way in helping veteran clients feel seen, understood and better supported in the decisions ahead.