If your clients are married, at this time of year they’re probably choosing to file their taxes under the status of Married Filing Jointly. But is MFJ the best move? Married folks have other options; one of them is Married Filing Separately (MFS). Despite this status sounding like someone’s dressing for divorce court, it can be useful in certain circumstances – or harmful.

Some clients marry into tax trouble – and then have no clue how to get out. Others are on the cusp of a separation or divorce and want the uncoupling (at least in the eyes of tax authorities) to start ASAP. Few clients who need the IRS tool called “innocent spouse relief” to unshackle themselves from a spouse’s tax mess (either one that spouse brought to the marriage or one they racked up later) seem to know about it. Here’s what to tell such a client about what this relief does and does not cover and what your client will have to prove before they can qualify – as well as how difficult this relief can be to get.

This year is far from over for tax planning – for some moves, you have even longer – but now’s the time to start looking and acting on your tax tactics given your circumstances and the 2023 you’ve had so far. What you do or don’t do now could save or cost you next April.

Should the rich pay more taxes? Are they dodging their equitable responsibility? Or do wealth taxes discourage people from the American dream of trying to get rich? Taxes are what the other guy in America should pay and the rich, with headline exemptions like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates , usually join the chorus of taxpayers who say they don’t want to pay more taxes no matter how much they’re worth. Call the concept one of a fair share or just simply unfair, a national wealth tax continues to ignite debate and legislation. What’s the latest?

Time flies when you’re dealing with taxes. For instance, eight years must have seemed like an epoch when Washington passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), the biggest federal tax reform in decades and one that altered tax brackets, deductions, and estate planning, to name just a few.

Best of all, lawmakers probably thought back then, we won’t have to worry about some of these provisions changing until all the way off in 2026!

Except suddenly, we now have less than 26 months to get ready for the end of nearly two dozen TCJA provisions that will happen without action from Congress. That’s barely enough time for some of the planning before what could be one of the biggest groundswell tax years of recent memory.

Common sense says that filing taxes as early as possible in the year gets an onerous chore off your plate and, chances are, gets your clients’ tax refund into their pockets quicker. Common sense can also be wrong if you need, as most taxpayers do, various tax-reporting forms that can arrive in early spring, if not later. There are also many other reasons you may, or may not want, to file your client’s taxes as early as possible.

The federal government is there to reduce taxpayer confusion.

That, at least, was one point of the reasoning for the recent IRS decision to again postpone a $600 tax-reporting threshold for people paid via third-party settlement networks. Those who made that amount on the likes of eBay and other online sales sites and who received payment via such platforms as PayPal and Venmo will not have that money reported to the IRS for another year.

Does this really let taxpayers off the hook? What strategies should you adapt for when the IRS does mandate this reporting?

Every tax season brings out the crooks and scammers trying to steal money and sensitive information using tax-related schemes, and even though we’re still a few months out from the beginning of filing season, it’s important to always be aware of threats out there and how you can combat them. Tax authorities like the IRS have countered these scams with electronic defenses that offer protection for both clients and tax preparers. Here’s a look at a few.

No client’s ever happy about having to pay state income tax in addition to federal, but at least in the past that chore was straightforward: Make money in a state, probably the one where you live and work, and you owe tax on what you made if that state has an income tax. Enter the computer and the fax machine, later the modem, email and Zoom. Then enter the pandemic and widespread remote work from home that’s largely lingered after Covid faded. Cap it off with the new maneuver of moving from a high-tax state to a low-tax one but not completely severing all former work and life connections. It is any surprise, really, that states would try to squeeze tax revenue out of that using regulations still unchanged from the past? And for punishing what that state suddenly thinks are tax cheats? Do you have a client a state might be interested in? How many states? And how do you actually know?

Even your most financially savvy client isn’t going to think clearly after the death of their spouse. Taxes will be last on their minds. That’s where you’ll come in, nudging them toward tax and money moves both immediate and long-term, from filing returns to budgeting income to taking a step-up in basis. Above all, don’t assume grieving clients know these details or that they’ll remember them in one of life’s toughest moments.

Tax reporting of overseas accounts has always been an extra chore for some American taxpayers. Now they might have to play a guessing game as well after the Supreme Court’s Bittner decision early this year.

The case is a prime example of how taxpayers with international holdings might wrest better tax judgments in the future.