CURRENT EDITION
What Happens If You Can’t Use All Your Clean Energy Tax Credits This Year?
Clean energy tax credits have a lot going for them. Clients buy them at a discount, apply them dollar-for-dollar against federal tax liability, and walk away paying less to the IRS. That alone makes them worth a serious look. But here's what often gets overlooked and what makes these investments genuinely remarkable compared to almost anything else in your tax planning toolkit: the flexibility built into how and when the credits can be used. Can't absorb the full credit this year? Carry it back up to three years and trigger refunds on taxes your client already paid. Think about that for a second. There are very few places in the tax code where you can go back in time and rewrite last year's tax bill. This is one of them. Still have excess after the carryback? Carry it forward for up to 22 years. That's not a typo. Two decades of runway to put those credits to work as your client's passive income grows. And if circumstances change and the credits simply aren't needed? An emerging secondary market means there may even be an option to sell them. No other common tax planning strategy offers this combination a guaranteed discount on purchase, dollar-for-dollar offset of tax liability, the ability to look backward and forward, and a potential exit if plans change. Understanding how each of these features works is what separates a good credit investment from a great one.
READ MOREA ChatGPT Plus User’s Guide to Effortlessly Creating Custom GPT Apps with GPT Builder
In an astonishing breakthrough that’s flipping the tax world on its head, certified tax planners now have the power to craft their very own AI-powered tax genie, thanks to the revolutionary GPT Builder. Gone are the days of sifting through stacks of tax codes and legislation. With a few clicks and a sprinkle of AI magic, these financial wizards are conjuring up custom tax strategies that promise to save fortunes. Dive into the future of tax planning where technology meets savvy to create the ultimate tax-saving ally. This isn’t just a game changer; it’s a wealth transformation phenomenon!
Read More
An S Corporation Basis Decision That You Need to Know About
The Estate of Thomas H. Fry v. Commissioner is an opinion that anybody who deals with S corporations needs to know about. You may have read about it as a taxpayer win and it is. Another reading is that it is a cautionary tale to not do what Thomas H. Fry and his team did with his S corporations, Crown Disposal Inc (CD) and CR Maintenance Services Inc (CRM). Think of the win part of this opinion as a life jacket that might come in handy if you run your ship into the rocks. Better you should pay attention to the rocks and avoid them.
Read More
An Overview of Health Reimbursement Arrangements
Life is the best teacher, especially in the tax industry. You can take all the continuing education that your heart desires, but sometimes the information doesn’t seem to really click until you have hands-on experience. That’s how it was for me when it came to Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). I learned about them in school. I even remember learning about them at the first accounting firm I worked at. But it wasn’t until I was working with a small business owner with his own “insurance” that I got it.
Read More
Revolutionizing Client Engagement: The Shift from EPTI to PAVER in Tax Reporting with Generative AI
Are you seeking innovative strategies to elevate your client reporting processes? Wondering how to transition from traditional methods to more engaging and personalized interactions? The emergence of generative AI has instigated a profound transformation in the domain of client communication for tax planners, shifting from the conventional Email, PDF, Telephone, In-person (EPTI) reporting techniques to a more advanced PAVER framework. Read on to find out more!
Read More
Hobby Loss Developments in 2023
The laws of tax planning that I developed over my writing career that will be expounded in the upcoming Reilly’s Laws of Tax Planning, published by Think Outside the Tax Box, lean a little on the conservative side, as tax planners use the term – conservative versus aggressive, not conservative versus liberal. This results, in large part, from their primary source being court decisions. The 18th law stands out from the others in this regard. “Honest objective trumps realistic expectation” encourages practitioners to be somewhat more aggressive in claiming losses from activities that seem a little dubious . I still hold that view, even though there have been no encouraging developments in 2023. Here is a roundup on the action last year through December 2, 2023.
Read More
Crypto Gains and Tax Court Games: Exploring the “Unclean Hands” Defense
Baseball, apple pie, and finding creative ways to pay fewer taxes, is there anything more American? Judge Learned Hand famously said in 1934, “Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.” Since the inception of the Federal Income Tax, taxpayers have looked for increasingly creative ways to avoid it. This exploration is no different: A taxpayer attempts to wash his hands of his tax liability all together.
Read More
TAX COURT ROUNDUP – MARCH 2024
February was Discovery Month at Tax Court. The high-deficiency, high-profile conservation easement cases coming from IRS crackdown put a premium on the old continuing legal education staple "win your case at discovery." But it doesn't go so well for shotgun demands, nor for broad-spectrum claims of privilege. Of course, more was resolved than just discovery disputes, but I'll get to those.
Read More
Mitigating Risks: A Roadmap for Withdrawing Employee Retention Credits or Filing Income Tax Returns for Clients Who Have
Just in – the IRS dropped a hot alert about the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), and it's time to pay attention . With the March 22, 2024, deadline creeping up for the ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program, it's crucial for those who mistakenly filed a claim to take action. This program lets businesses repay just 80% of the claimed amount, so it's a chance to make things right. If your clients filed a claim that's still in the pipeline, it's time for a double-check. Review the guidelines ASAP and withdraw the claim if it doesn't pass muster.
Read More
NOT A MEMBER YET?
SUBSCRIBE TO GET ALL OF OUR
GREAT ARTICLES AND RESOURCES!
CURRENT EDITION
What Happens If You Can’t Use All Your Clean Energy Tax Credits This Year?
Clean energy tax credits have a lot going for them. Clients buy them at a discount, apply them dollar-for-dollar against federal tax liability, and walk away paying less to the IRS. That alone makes them worth a serious look. But here’s what often gets overlooked and what makes these investments genuinely remarkable compared to almost anything else in your tax planning toolkit: the flexibility built into how and when the credits can be used. Can’t absorb the full credit this year? Carry it back up to three years and trigger refunds on taxes your client already paid. Think about that for a second. There are very few places in the tax code where you can go back in time and rewrite last year’s tax bill. This is one of them. Still have excess after the carryback? Carry it forward for up to 22 years. That’s not a typo. Two decades of runway to put those credits to work as your client’s passive income grows. And if circumstances change and the credits simply aren’t needed? An emerging secondary market means there may even be an option to sell them. No other common tax planning strategy offers this combination a guaranteed discount on purchase, dollar-for-dollar offset of tax liability, the ability to look backward and forward, and a potential exit if plans change. Understanding how each of these features works is what separates a good credit investment from a great one.
Perspectives on IRS Scrutiny of Captive Insurance Elections
The Internal Revenue Service has made no secret of its increased scrutiny of captive insurance arrangements, particularly those involving the small insurance company election. For taxpayers and their advisors, this has created understandable concern and, in some cases, hesitation about whether captive insurance remains a viable risk management and tax planning tool. Yet heightened scrutiny does not mean prohibition. The Internal Revenue Code continues to recognize captive insurance, Congress has refined it, and courts evaluate it based on well-established insurance principles. The real issue is not whether captives are allowed, but whether a specific taxpayer has a legitimate business need for insurance, has structured the arrangement properly, and has implemented it in a manner consistent with both tax law and insurance fundamentals. Understanding where scrutiny arises, how elections function, and what separates compliant captives from problematic ones is critical for CPAs advising closely held businesses today.
Strict Substantiation: Why Being Right Without Proof Can Cost You Your Charitable Deduction
Reilly’s Sixteenth Law of Tax Planning – Being right without substantiation can be as bad as being wrong – is particularly apt when it comes to charitable contributions. The case law makes it clear that there is not much wiggle room in rules relating to substantiation and reporting of charitable contributions. We’ll dig into the rules here.
