LOOKING FOR LEGAL WAYS
TO REDUCE TAX?
New tax reduction strategies carefully explained and exhaustively researched every two weeks. Receive breaking news updates on tax law changes. Members only monthly AMA with TOTTB.tax.
WE PUBLISH TAX STRATEGIES FOR…
FEATURED CONTENT
Building Land Allocations for the Little People – The Truth About the 80/20 Rule
If you own real estate, you’re no doubt familiar with that wonderful paper loss called depreciation. But you may not be entirely aware that land cannot depreciate. Alas, you must delete part of the price you paid for your real estate land from your original purchase price to generate your tax deduction. A cost segregation study might be the answer. The study, done by an engineer, can accurately allocate the cost between building and land. This price of the allocation can be cost-justified; after all, it can save you tax. But at lower depreciation amounts, the benefits might not outweigh the cost, or, if you’re a tax pro, your client might not believe it does. You’ve still got a tax return to do. Regulation 1.167(a)-5 tells us that we have to do something: In the case of the acquisition on or after March 1, 1913, of a combination of depreciable and nondepreciable property for a lump sum, as for example, buildings and land, the basis for depreciation cannot exceed an amount which bears the same proportion to the lump sum as the value of the depreciable property at the time of acquisition bears to the value of the entire property at that time. It doesn't really give us much guidance. But you may have seen online or heard somewhere about the old 80/20 rule. That’s right, the tax law says 80 percent of cost gets allocated to the building with the remaining going to land. Only, hold on a second, I can’t find a citation for that one. Is it possible there is no such rule? Then again, Reilly’s 19th Law of Tax Planning says that Reilly uses sarcasm when discussing tax. For the truth about this rule, continue reading here.
Read More
CURRENT EDITION
Tax Loss Harvesting with Cryptocurrency
In the Fall of 2025, Bitcoin reached an all-time high of over $120,000. Since then, it fell over 40% to under $70,000 in the first quarter of 2026, before slightly recovering, currently resting around $75,000 as of this writing. With the steep drop in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, a common question from taxpayers is whether they can use the current losses to offset their other income. Large investors and professionals such as Grant Cardone and Shehan Chandrasekera (Head of Tax Strategy at Cointracker) have suggested that cryptocurrency can be sold and bought back immediately to claim the tax benefits. As with most things, the answer to this is not as simple as they portray, and many commentators, influencers, and sometimes professionals, miss the intricacies of cryptocurrency taxation.
The Kwong Tsunami: Why Form 843 Claims Could Soon Flood Your Practice
The buzz around the Kwong v. United States decision is quickly turning into something very real for practitioners: potentially a wave of Form 843 claims tied to COVID-era penalties and interest. With voices like Frank Agostino pushing for action, the message is clear: dig into client transcripts and don’t sit this one out, even though the outcome is still being litigated.
The Strategic Tax Analysis Process: Your Systematic Approach
Early in my career as a tax professional, I thought identifying strategic opportunities was primarily a function of technical knowledge. If I just knew enough tax law, I assumed the right strategies would naturally reveal themselves when reviewing a client’s situation. This assumption led to a haphazard approach where I might spot a planning opportunity for one client but completely miss an identical opportunity for another simply because I wasn’t methodically looking for it. This inconsistent approach changed when, leaning on my training as an instrument rated pilot, it occurred to me that I should be following a structured process that assures that I won’t miss any opportunities. That observation transformed my practice. I realized that identifying strategic opportunities isn’t just about what you know—it’s about how systematically you apply that knowledge. Even the most knowledgeable tax professional will miss opportunities without a structured methodology for uncovering them. In this article, I’ll share the systematic strategic analysis process I’ve developed over three decades of tax practice. This methodology doesn’t replace technical knowledge—it magnifies its impact by ensuring you consistently identify opportunities across diverse client situations.
SIMPLIFIED TAX STRATEGIES &
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION
Think Outside the Tax Box provides tax reduction strategies along with practical
implementation advice in order to reduce your clients’ federal tax bill with ease.
