Individual Strategies

If you own real estate, you’re no doubt familiar with that wonderful paper loss called depreciation. But you may not be entirely aware that land cannot depreciate. Alas, you must delete part of the price you paid for your real estate land from your original purchase price to generate your tax deduction. A cost segregation study might be the answer. The study, done by an engineer, can accurately allocate the cost between building and land. This price of the allocation can be cost-justified; after all, it can save you tax. But at lower depreciation amounts, the benefits might not outweigh the cost, or, if you’re a tax pro, your client might not believe it does. You’ve still got a tax return to do. Regulation 1.167(a)-5 tells us that we have to do something: In the case of the acquisition on or after March 1, 1913, of a combination of depreciable and nondepreciable property for a lump sum, as for example, buildings and land, the basis for depreciation cannot exceed an amount which bears the same proportion to the lump sum as the value of the depreciable property at the time of acquisition bears to the value of the entire property at that time. It doesn't really give us much guidance. But you may have seen online or heard somewhere about the old 80/20 rule. That’s right, the tax law says 80 percent of cost gets allocated to the building with the remaining going to land. Only, hold on a second, I can’t find a citation for that one. Is it possible there is no such rule? Then again, Reilly’s 19th Law of Tax Planning says that Reilly uses sarcasm when discussing tax. For the truth about this rule, continue reading here.

I’ve been spending too much time thinking about wrapping. You might picture presents neatly wrapped under a Christmas tree, or surprise birthday gifts next to the cake, but I’m thinking of something very different: cryptocurrency token wrapping. A wrapped token is a token that represents a cryptocurrency from another blockchain or token standard. A wrapped token can be used on certain non-native blockchains and redeemed in the future for the original currency. It is typically worth the same as the original cryptocurrency, but when it isn’t, the question arises that when you exchange virtual currency for other property (including other virtual currency) is there tax due, and if so, how much? Like many areas of cryptocurrency tax, the IRS has yet to issue guidance on this topic, resulting in taxpayers having to fend for themselves. The primary question you need to answer is, “Is wrapping cryptocurrency a realization event?” The answer to this question will influence the ultimate tax treatment. Keep reading to learn more.

Question: How can my rental real estate property qualify for the 199A QBI deduction? Answer: The age-old CPA answer of “it depends” certainly applies here. To qualify for the 20 percent deduction, your enterprise has to, as a threshold, be a trade or a business. So whether a real estate rental is a trade or a business is a thing that matters like… Can analysis be worthwhile? Real estate management companies that want to distinguish themselves should be looking at IRS Notice 2019-07. That is the main lesson of today’s post, but it also applies to tax preparers and self-sufficient owners. There is something new to keep track of, and it is a lot easier if you do it as you go rather than after the fact. I’ve got something here for preparers and property managers, when acting sooner rather than later will be helpful. It’s theory is it is easier to collect information actively when it is fresh, rather than a year or more later as often happens in tax work. Click here to continue reading.

Tax Court Docket 26425-21 can serve as a wake-up call to your clients who have been dabbling in cryptocurrency. TaxNotes has published the petition if you want to know the name and profession of the taxpayer involved, but I am just going to call him Joe. Joe is doing pretty well in his profession. Just for the heck of it he decided to dabble in crypto. He never had more than ten to fifteen thousand dollars invested in crypto. What could possibly go wrong?

Pedants will argue that you shouldn't refer to Code Section 183 - Activities not Engaged in For Profit as the "hobby loss rule", because the word hobby appears nowhere in the statute. The pedants scored a point in 2021, but I will still be sticking with the term. It looked like a slow year for hobby loss developments, but we finished with two major cases including a big taxpayer win. Let’s take a look.

It is the best of times, it is the worst of times – and charity cannot only help those in need; it can provide some hefty tax deductions to the donor, as well.

It seems like the left and the right have entered into a competition as to which side can make the silliest tax observation. The New York Times came out strong for the left as its team of reporters was handed fragments of Trump’s 1995 tax filings. They proceeded to “explain” flow-through entities and net operating losses, fairly mundane tax concepts, as if they were tools of Satan. It did not take long for the right to strike back at least as imprudently.

At least once a week in the cryptocurrency community, there is a new post or article encouraging crypto investors to relocate to Puerto Rico to avoid tax. Relocating to the Caribbean is certainly an attractive proposition, but is it too good to be true? In the words of every good tax professional everywhere, “It depends.” Becoming a resident of Puerto Rico does have some potential tax benefits that come with it, but it is no slam dunk decision. Let’s take a trip together to the Island of Enchantment, grab a cocktail on the beach, and lower our tax bill!