All Podcasts
Our podcast shares samples from our exclusive articles, written by some of the top working tax professionals in the industry, voiced in a conversational-style for our valued monthly & annual subscribers who are on the go!
This podcast is AI generated and may introduce errors that the original source material does not have. Further, the audio versions may be lacking citations that the original written materials provide. At all times, refer to the original written source material found exclusively here on our website.
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.
Will AMT Make a Comeback After OBBBA?
Following Betteridge’s Law of Headlines, the answer to the question posed in the headline is, “no.” Actually — because we’re talking about taxes here — we can say the answer is never so definitive, so let’s change it to “probably not.” But it’s more complicated than it may seem.
Real World Ethics: What Happens When a Judge Doesn’t Understand Tax Law
We all know how messy tax returns can get when couples who used to file jointly divorce and there are children (and tax credits) involved. It’s often difficult to explain the rules surrounding Head of Household filing status and the various tax credits available to parent-clients who have separated or
Syndicated Easements: Fresh IRS Offer and the Perils of Post-BBA Gamesmanship
The IRS has issued a statement about a new settlement offer that is going out for conservation and historic preservation easement disputes. It is similar to previous offers, but there is one big difference. The partnership will not have to make a payment at the time that it accepts the
Lessons Learned from the Tax Court: What’s at Stake?
Astute readers of this publication may recognize that I frequently write on Cryptocurrency and also on Tax Court cases. It feels like Christmas to me to be able to write about a tax court case about crypto. This is only the Third Tax court case to even mention crypto, and
Will AMT Make a Comeback After OBBBA?
Real World Ethics: What Happens When a Judge Doesn’t Understand Tax Law
Syndicated Easements: Fresh IRS Offer and the Perils of Post-BBA Gamesmanship
Lessons Learned from the Tax Court: What’s at Stake?
NOT A Subscriber YET?
SUBSCRIBE TO GET ALL OF OUR
GREAT ARTICLES AND RESOURCES!
CURRENT EDITION
Will AMT Make a Comeback After OBBBA?
Following Betteridge’s Law of Headlines, the answer to the question posed in the headline is, “no.” Actually — because we’re talking about taxes here — we can say the answer is never so definitive, so let’s change it to “probably not.” But it’s more complicated than it may seem.
Why Citizenship, Residency, and Domicile Matter
If you spend any time in the world of cross-border taxes, you start to notice a pattern: the hardest problems usually begin with a deceptively simple question—who gets to tax you? And the answer is rarely as simple as “the country where I live.” That’s because tax systems don’t rely on just one concept to decide who belongs in their net. They use citizenship, residency, and domicile. These terms sound similar, and people often use them interchangeably in casual conversation, but in tax law they mean very different things. For globally mobile individuals, understanding the difference matters. You can be a U.S. citizen, a tax resident of another country, and still have your long-term home base tied to a different jurisdiction altogether. Each label can trigger different tax consequences, different filing obligations, and different planning opportunities.
Sophisticated EMR Software Meets Old-School Skimming: Lessons From The Aryanpure Case
The simplest way to reduce your taxable income from an S corporation is to take some of the gross receipts directly into your personal account without running them through the corporate books. Don’t mention this to your tax preparer and make sure they don’t find out. If you get caught by the IRS, though, hire an expert to explain why it is your preparer’s fault. This plan did not work all that well for a couple, both physicians, who were running two medical family medical clinics through an S Corporation called MedExpress. They ended up being liable for the fraud penalty which has the collateral effect of extending the statute of limitations indefinitely. At 75% the fraud penalty is as bad as it can get without losing your liberty.
