Articles

Something we never have a shortage of are proposals to change our tax systems. When it’s election time, we hear even more proposals, as well as how various parts of our tax system are flawed, usually due to actions or inactions of the opposing party. We also hear lots of incomplete statements, promises of tax changes too costly to be enacted, and ideas that will be replaced by the time the winner gets down to crafting a real set of tax and budget proposals. This article describes some of the tax proposals of the two presidential candidates along with suggestions on how we should analyze them against principles supporting effective tax systems, with highlights of some important facts seemingly missing from current tax discussions. These proposals are also relevant to members of Congress as to whether they support any of them and how they align with tax changes that the member would like to see enacted.

Much of what happens in Tax Court is run-of-the-mill. Once the tax general practitioner learns the jurisdictional limits and procedural moguls, s/he can advise clients whether to spend the sixty bucks and the certified mail fees when TAS, Examination or Appeals can’t deliver an acceptable result. Following the Court’s orders and opinions for a while should do that. I try to present the less-than-usual, below-radar points for generalists and specialists.